The Data Fork is like a file on any other computer system, and it’s where universal data (like MP3 songs, JPEG pictures, and plain text) reside. It has to do with the way the Mac stores its files using the HFS file system.Ī Macintosh file has two “forks” inside it, the Data Fork and the Resource Fork. The Mac’s HFS File Systemīefore we talk about how to burn CDs for older Macs, it’s important to understand why it’s sometimes difficult. Readers with further information are encouraged to email their stories or techniques so we can update this article. Highly advanced users will probably be able to connect a USB floppy drive, determine its device node, and use the method outlined above for Unix-like systems. Mac OS XĪt this time, I am not aware of a good, user-friendly way to write floppies from disk images using Mac OS X. For a DiskCopy image, “dd if=path_to_image_file of=path_to_floppy_drive bs=84 skip=1” is the right way, according to The pickle’s Low-End Mac FAQ. If the image file is a raw image, a simple “dd if=path_to_image_file of=path_to_floppy_drive” will do the trick. Linux users can use the “dd” command to write floppies from image files. For more information, read this FreeDOS page. Put the disk image file and Rawrite into drive C, open a DOS window, type C:\Rawrite, and follow the directions. The Windows utility Rawrite can be used to write image files to a floppy using a PC. From the Utilities menu, choose Make a Floppy… and follow the directions onscreen. With Mac OS 9 and earlier, just use Disk Copy 6.3.3, which you can freely download from Apple. Writing a Floppy Disk from an Image Classic Mac OS I hope to make them available soon using Disk Copy 4.2 format for maximum cross-platform convenience. I’m currently cooking up some Mac boot floppies that will make installing System software a breeze. These will be immediately useful without any decompression. If StuffIt Expander isn’t available, attempt to find the necessary disk image in uncompressed Disk Copy 4.2 format. This free program is available for Mac, Windows, and Linux/i386. Before these disk images can be written onto real floppy disks, they must be decompressed with StuffIt Expander. Many sources of Mac floppy disk images distribute them in StuffIt (.sit) format. (All other vintage Macs have a 1.4 MB SuperDrive or FDHD floppy drive, which is compatible with modern computers.) StuffIt Expander This means that boot disks for a Mac 128K, 512K, 512Ke, Plus, pre-FDHD SE, or un-upgraded Mac II cannot be made on a Mac OS X, Linux, or Windows machine. When written to a floppy, these images create exact copies of the master disks.ĭue to physical differences between Mac and PC floppy drives, 800K double density Mac floppies can only be written by other vintage Macs. These floppies are distilled into disk images you can download from the Web. Installing System 6 or System 7.0.1 onto an older Mac is only possible using floppy disks, and the first step to installing System 7.5 is usually “boot from a floppy”. And that’s what we’ll talk about: Free tools for writing Mac floppy disks and HFS CD-ROMs using modern Mac, Windows, and Linux computers. To get that vintage Mac up-and-running, you need to be able to write downloaded software onto disks that an older Mac can read. 2007: One of the biggest hassles of the vintage Macintosh hobby is loading software onto your first older Mac. What more is there to consider, beyond personal preference or bias for/against an icon or a slightly different interface or a company? What other facts prove that one app is better than another for handling. They all are small utility apps that don't require much system resources. For someone who's not using any of these apps and wants to make a choice, what facts would lead them to choose one of these apps over another? From what I have seen: It's perfectly understandable that most people prefer what they're familiar with. rar files, what makes Unarchiver better than StuffIT Expander, or what makes UnRarX better than Keka, or what makes Keka better than Unarchiver? For day-to-day compression/uncompression of. I'm looking for factual, logical reasons why it makes sense to replace StuffIt Expander with the Unarchiver or UnRarX or Keka or any other app. It makes no difference to me, as long as the app does what I need it to do. I could have just as easily selected UnRarX or one of the others. When I first selected StuffIt Expander over 3 years ago, it appeared the choices were all the same, so it didn't matter which app I chose. As I said, I have no allegiance or emotional attachment to any app. Click to expand.I'm not defensive at all, and I'm quite chilled, but thanks anyway.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |